RE: longdesc in the wild [was: Re: Is longdesc a good solution? ...] from John Foliot on 2008-09-11 (public-html@w3.org from September 2008)

From: John Foliot <foliot@wats.ca>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:08:56 -0700
To: "'Jim Jewett'" <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, "'HTML WG'" <public-html@w3.org>, <wai-xtech@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000201c913dd$480e59d0$0a00000a@stanford.edu>

Jim Jewett wrote:

>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Sep/0350.html)
> 
> Several people have said that the newest tools are the
> first that do support longdesc well, so it may be that we have ~1
> year of history and ~12 years of magic talismans -- with that study
> conducted during the magic talisman period.    

+1!!

JF

Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 07:09:46 UTC