the "special" doctype (ISSUE-54), was: several messages

Ian Hickson wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> Ian Hickson wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>> Based on the above feedback, I've allowed "XSLT-generated" as a string
>>>> in the DOCTYPE.
>>>> ...
>>> I think Mike's proposal to allow the empty string instead got more
>>> positive feedback.
>> This was also my understanding.
> This isn't a popularity contest. The reasoning behind not using the empty 
> string was quite adequately given by both Henri and Smylers, and quoted in 
> my original message.

No, it isn't.

This is a Working Group trying to come up with a good solution, and I 
don't think we're done yet.

To the chairs: I'd recommend that you put the question, and give people 
the choice between the doctypes that have been suggested.

BR, Julian

Received on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 20:48:16 UTC