- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 00:07:02 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, Public MathML mailing list <www-math@w3.org>
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008, Henri Sivonen wrote: \> On Apr 10, 2008, at 12:51, Ian Hickson wrote: > > On Fri, 9 Jun 2006, Henri Sivonen wrote: > > > > > > If the WHAT WG defines a way for serializing MathML as text/html, I > > > think it should be (at least for conforming cases) a pure alternative > > > infoset serialization for a subset of possible infosets (dirty words, I > > > know) as opposed to just being something similar but subtly different. > > > That is, I think conforming documents should be losslessly > > > reserializable as XML *1.0* and the DOM nodes for the math stuff should > > > report the uncolonified element name in lower case as localName and the > > > MathML namespace URI as namespaceURI. (I guess tagName should do what is > > > most compatible with MathPlayer.) > > > > Does what the spec says satisfy this? > > As far as I can tell, the spec satisfies the constraint I presented for > conforming content except when free-form element (e.g. <mtext>) or > attribute value (?) contains a form feed or a vertical tab. I expect the > rendering behavior of form feeds and vertical tabs in <mtext> to be > undefined, which is bad. > > I can't comment on the tagName/MathPlayer part due to lack of suitable > testing environment. Are form feeds and vertical tabs allowed in MathML <mtext> and attributes? -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 23 May 2008 00:07:41 UTC