- From: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 10:38:26 -0400
- To: "Philip TAYLOR \(Ret'd\)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>, "Dave Singer" <singer@apple.com>, "HTML Working Group" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
too bad we can't get all tools to implement option 1. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Philip TAYLOR (Ret'd)" <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> To: "Daniel Glazman" <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> Cc: "Gez Lemon" <gez.lemon@gmail.com>; "Dave Singer" <singer@apple.com>; "HTML Working Group" <public-html@w3.org>; "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 10:27 AM Subject: Re: [html4all] HTML5 Alternative Text, and Authoring Tools There are really only two options, if the user refuses to provide ALT text : 1) Emit nothing. 2) Emit invalid HTML Since users will abandon, in droves, tools that implement option (1), only tools that implement option (2) will survive natural selection. Philip TAYLOR -------- Daniel Glazman wrote: > So conformance criteria for a tool include the possibility of non- > conformance for output instances. I think the test suite for > an authoring tool is going to be a bit of a syllogism. > > tool A is conformant because it outputs conformant instances > but since it should also be able to output non-conformant instances, > conformance is nill. So it's conformant and non-conformant at the same > time. > > And I hope nobody has certification in mind !
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2008 14:39:09 UTC