- From: David Poehlman <david.poehlman@handsontechnologeyes.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 15:44:22 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Matt Morgan-May" <mattmay@adobe.com>, "HTML Working Group" <public-html@w3.org>, "W3C WAI-XTECH" <wai-xtech@w3.org>
yes. On May 14, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Henri Sivonen wrote: On May 14, 2008, at 19:51, David Poehlman wrote: > One of the stumbling blocks is that AT does make an effort to repair > missing > alt and if it didn't authors might have to work a bit harder to get > what > they want rendered. A lot of developpers know tha AT will repair > alt no > matter how dismally so don't even try. "image" is qauite enough for > me > thank you. If reading "image" is enough for you, doesn't it mean that the AT that tries to read the file name is defective for your purposes? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 19:45:02 UTC