- From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 20:19:57 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 13 May 2008, at 11:56, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jim Jewett wrote: > >>>> Currently the only element allowed "wherever a subdocument fragment >>>> is allowed in a compound document" is the html element. RFC4287 >>>> mandates that within an Atom document, for an XHTML text construct, >>>> it must have a single div element as the content. >> >>> Given that Atom or another spec could as easily have allowed any >>> flow >>> content, or ... My intention wasn't to disallow ... My intention was >>> just to allow <html> to be used in other vocabularies where those >>> vocabularies just specified a generic inclusion point. >> >> Why not just say so explicitly? For example, just after: [...] > > Hmm, good idea. Added an example. I'm assuming you mean r1602. It isn't just atom:content, but also all Atom XHTML Text Constructs (which, from RFC4287 are atom:title, atom:summary, atom:subtitle, and atom:rights, though APP may add more to that list (but I don't know about that), so it'll be better to reference the section that defines XHTML Text Constructs). -- Geoffrey Sneddon <http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 19:20:38 UTC