- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 10:56:12 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Jim Jewett <jimjjewett@gmail.com>
- Cc: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, foolistbar@googlemail.com
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jim Jewett wrote: > >> Currently the only element allowed "wherever a subdocument fragment > >> is allowed in a compound document" is the html element. RFC4287 > >> mandates that within an Atom document, for an XHTML text construct, > >> it must have a single div element as the content. > > > Given that Atom or another spec could as easily have allowed any flow > > content, or ... My intention wasn't to disallow ... My intention was > > just to allow <html> to be used in other vocabularies where those > > vocabularies just specified a generic inclusion point. > > Why not just say so explicitly? For example, just after: [...] Hmm, good idea. Added an example. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2008 10:56:50 UTC