- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2008 16:27:24 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: WHAT WG List <whatwg@whatwg.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > Summary: profile="" doesn't work in practice so we have dropped it. We > haven't replaced it with anything since there isn't really a problem to > solve -- conflicts don't occur in practice, as Microformat names are > picked to be rather unique and recognisable. The market takes care of > problems like this without the need for namespace syntax. > ... I disagree. 1) Conflicts *do* occur, as soon as you consider extensions that happen outside the microformats process (and that process seems to exclude private extensions, such as for intranet applications). 2) As a matter of fact, <http://microformats.org/wiki/profile-uris> states "In hcalendar-issues, it is ACCEPTED that each microformat should have a profile URI, like the XFN profile (http://gmpg.org/xfn/11)." So it seems you are in disagreement with the microformats community as well. That being said; I agree that the profile attribute is not a good solution, as it is of limited use only. Thus, instead of removing it we should think about fixing it, or using something that works instead (RDFa comes to mind). BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2008 14:28:12 UTC