W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2008

Re: Exploring new vocabularies for HTML

From: Neil Soiffer <Neils@dessci.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 22:02:12 -0700
Message-ID: <d98bce170803292202g4d24e542v1681570a1f9c91f7@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
Cc: "David Carlisle" <davidc@nag.co.uk>, public-html@w3.org, www-math@w3.org
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:17 PM, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> wrote:

> <snip>
> > > (Boy there are a lot of MathML elements, even in Presentation MathML.)
> >
> > not really, presentational mathematics is a bunch of special layout
> > forms, and compared to say the markup html uses for tables, the level of
> > element use per layout form is similar. (except as previously commented
> > tokens such as numbers and identifiers are marked up individually).
> There's over 80 different presentational MathML elements in MathML3.
> That's a lot of elements for one small part of HTML. Whether they are
> justified or not is not really what I'm arguing. :-)
I just did a count and come up with 32 presentation elements in MathML 3; 35
if you include semantics/annotation/annotation-xml.  I might have missed one
or two, but I'm hard pressed to see how you came up with more than 80
elements -- can you list the elements you think are presentation elements?

Neil Soiffer
Senior Scientist
Design Science, Inc.
~ Makers of Equation Editor, MathType, MathPlayer and MathFlow ~
Received on Sunday, 30 March 2008 05:02:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:27 UTC