Henri Sivonen wrote on 03/19/2008 11:02:38 AM: > > On Mar 19, 2008, at 15:13, Sam Ruby wrote: > > OK, then I will simply point to correct SVG fragments that conform > > to the "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 plus SVG 1.1//EN" DTD: > > > > http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001475.html > > > > Note the use of prefixes. A use that is mandated by the DTD. > > I think being compatible with the usual output from Illustrator > (copying and pasting the <svg> tree--not the prolog cruft) is more > important than being compatible with a relatively obscure DTD. Those > prefixes are not there because of SVG editors or renderers. They are > there because of limitations of DTDs. DTDs are dead as far as HTML5 is > concerned. Did you intentionally cut out the part where I said that I am completely and thouroughly OK with such considerations? :-P - Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 19 March 2008 16:40:01 UTC