Re: UA support for Content-Disposition header (filename parameter)

On Mar 16, 2008, at 12:01 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>>> So why would this be out-of-scope for HTML5, while it (still)  
>>> includes crap like "Peer-to-peer connections over IrDA" (< 
>>> >)?
>> Now I'm not sure if you are trying to solve a problem in good faith  
>> or making an ironic suggestion to prove some sort of philosophical  
>> point.
> I'm being ironic because I have no idea where the people who decide  
> what's in and what's out draw the line.

In the future, please let's apply this wise policy:


Received on Sunday, 16 March 2008 22:47:34 UTC