W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2008

Re: Conformance of DL Groups Missing DT or DD

From: Lee Kowalkowski <lee.kowalkowski@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:46:14 +0000
Message-ID: <610592c90802270246q1ede7a1ava430370f9588d270@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org

On 27/02/2008, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote:
> can get. Therefore in HTML4 clearly dl/dt or dl/dd is already
> the best choice for most parts of poetry.

I think we are missing a trick.  We can't argue a poem marked up as
dl/dt or dl/dd should be conforming.  Poets are allowed to break the
rules, it's poetic license.



Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2008 10:46:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Saturday, 9 October 2021 18:44:26 UTC