- From: Dmitry Turin <html60@narod.ru>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:54:27 +0200
- To: public-html@w3.org
By the way, what is the procedure (of voting ?), in result of which proposals are being included into 'Working Draft' or not included ? >> Let's enter some of my proposals, >> which met approval and not met objections, e.g. >> http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/vml_eng.htm TB> I'm really not found of using <table> for layout. Idea is quite different: to give possibility to draft line in _html_ document. Following your logic about SVG, we have to refuse from html itself. --- Let's prolong revision. What is your opinion about sending identical elements (instead of <field>) http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/quest_eng.htm#tag_or_attribute http://sql50.euro.ru/sql5.11.2.ppt slides #5-6 http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/hidden_eng.htm or about supporting multi-dimensional data http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/tabfile_eng.htm http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/cube_eng.htm ------- >> http://html60.euro.ru/site/html60/en/author/label_eng.htm TB> ./a.htm#xpointer(/html/body/p[187]/em[2]) TB> ./b.htm#xpointer(//body/h2[5]) TB> ./c.htm#xpointer(/html/body/h3[4]/following-sibling::p[12]) TB> ./d.htm#xpointer(//body/h1[3]/h2[2]/h3[5]/following-sibling::p[8]/b[3]) Such using XPointer is part of standard ? TB> ./a.htm#xpointer(/html/body/h1[text()[contains(.,"special TB> count")]][1]/img[contains(@src,"./pic.jpg")][1]) TB> A bit less readable Not less. It's very bad for users. Dmitry Turin HTML6 (6. 5.4) http://html60.euro.ru SQL5 (5.11.1) http://sql50.euro.ru Unicode7 (7. 2.1) http://unicode70.euro.ru Computer2 (2. 0.2) http://computer20.euro.ru
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2008 13:52:15 UTC