Ian Hickson wrote: > In the spec as it stands today, <b> and <i> are not presentational and > semantic-free. They are in fact defined in a semantic manner, just like > <strong>, <em>, etc. Yes, in the /draft/ specification as it stands today [1], your assertion is correct. However <b>, <i> and <u> /are/ purely presentational, and the fact that the draft specification misrepresents this is a matter of considerable concern and regret. I for one will be seeking to ensure that this is corrected in a future draft, and that the <b> and <i> elements do not appear in the specification when it is finally released. Philip TAYLOR -------- [1] W3C Working Draft 9 February 2008Received on Saturday, 9 February 2008 08:43:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:15:30 UTC