- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2008 18:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Philip TAYLOR <Philip-and-LeKhanh@Royal-Tunbridge-Wells.Org>
- Cc: HTMLWG <public-html@w3.org>
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Philip TAYLOR wrote: > > If I cannot convince you that <strike> is purely presentational (and > therefore semantic-free), just as are <b>, <u>, <i> and so on), whilst > <strike> (cf. <strong>, <heading>, <em>) are purely semantic and carry > no presentational overtones, then I am afraid we will have to differ. In the spec as it stands today, <b> and <i> are not presentational and semantic-free. They are in fact defined in a semantic manner, just like <strong>, <em>, etc. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Friday, 8 February 2008 18:40:16 UTC