- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 19:02:24 +0100
- To: gonchuki <gonchuki@gmail.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org
gonchuki 08-02-07 16.27: > On Feb 7, 2008 1:04 PM, Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no> wrote: > > > > Chasen Le Hara 08-02-07 07.19: > > > In Bugzilla, a reference to a bug that has been resolved is linked and > > > stricken through > > I think you have brought up a very good usecase for STRIKE here. Here > > the stricken text represent the very reference to the bug. > > A resolved bug won't appear in the next release of the "known issues" > document, thus it has been actually <del>eted from it, plus, a > resolved bug always contains a date and time, fitting perfectly with > the datetime attribute from the <del> element. > It seeems as if you are associating freely ;-) > But what's more important, resolved bugs could be either marked with a > line-through, with a tick icon to the left, set with display: none or > whatever the designer chooses it to be, you may even want to leave > resolved bugs with the same visual appearance as an open bug since you > are on the "resolved bugs" section of the file, then tell me how a > <strike> that implies visual representation can be useful in such > scenarios The meaning of 'strike' is 'invalid(ated)'. Instead of keeping an database of all resolved bugs in the the stylesheet - as Thomas Broyer suggested, one could mark up each resolved/invalid bug as stricken/invalid, and then use CSS to give the bugs the relevant attention, based upon the context these bugs appears in. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 18:03:05 UTC