- From: Leif Halvard Silli <lhs@malform.no>
- Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2008 18:42:53 +0100
- To: public-html@w3.org
Smylers 08-02-07 17.38: > Leif Halvard Silli writes: > > > Chasen Le Hara 08-02-07 07.19: > > > > > ... one use case for the strike element for discussion: its (lack > > > of) use in Bugzilla. > > > > > > In Bugzilla, a reference to a bug that has been resolved is linked > > > and stricken through (using a class). The del element is > > > inappropriate in this circumstance because the reference is not an > > > edit to the document (nor is the reference being deleted), which > > > leaves a class or the strike element. > > > > I think you have brought up a very good usecase for STRIKE here. Here > > the stricken text represent the very reference to the bug. > > However there are a number of other presentations that bug tracking > systems could use to denote closed bugs -- for example they could be in > red rather than black. But that wouldn't be a reason for adding a <red> > element. > HTML 5 says that B and I are not necessarily rendered in bold or in italics. The same goes without saying about STRIKE. It does not need to have that line-through style. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 7 February 2008 17:43:22 UTC