- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2008 13:03:02 +0100
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, public-html@w3.org
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... > Wikis have full history, if someone vandalises the page, just fix it. It's > not difficult. :-) > ... It's time consuming -- to work reliably, one essentially needs to monitor all changes. >> URIs as identifiers (when chosen properly) already avoid name clashes; I >> don't see why it would make sense to register them in a central place. > > The registration is not intended to avoid name clashes, doing that is > easy. The registration is meant to provide a way for people to find out > what values mean, so that they can interoperate. Which is something URIs-as-identifiers can be good at, too. > ... > If there are issues that have not been raised, please raise them, > otherwise they won't be considered. If there are issues that have been > raised but not yet considered, then (assuming they are in Bugzilla, or if > I have noticed them and saved them to one of my folders) they will be > dealt with in due course. If there are issues that have been raised and > dealt with and you just didn't like the conclusion, then please raise this > with the chairs, so that we can follow the proper W3C escalation process. > ... I think these are issues the chairs are aware of, it's the whole area of how extensibility is supposed to work. > However, in the latter case, unless I made some gross error or was biased > in some way, which I try hard to avoid, I don't really see what the > process is going to do differently unless we end up with working group > decisions that are technically unsound. And no, I'm not going to participate in yet another process discussion. BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 24 December 2008 12:03:44 UTC