- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 20:56:57 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > Ian Hickson wrote: > > > > > > > You can get a list currently by clicking on the <dfn> for "form- > > > > > > > associated element". > > Ah, ok. Note that <option> also has a |form| DOM attribute, but in > Gecko this is done by getting the |form| of the corresponding <select> > instead of making the <option> directly form-associated. Indeed, that's what is currently specced too: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#dom-option-form Are you saying I should do that for <legend> instead of making it form-associated? That would certainly make the spec and implementations simpler, and would mean we didn't have to have a form="" content attribute on <legend>. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 20:57:35 UTC