Re: SURVEY: What should the HTML WG publish first? (re-opened)

On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 07:15 +0100, Ben 'Cerbera' Millard wrote:
> Dan Connolly wrote:
> > If your position has changed or you didn't respond previously,
> > please fill out the form...
> >  <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd7>
> >
> > Results are, as usual, world-readable.
> >  <http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/wd7/results>
> 
> Can "2. Which document should we focus on for first publication?" be a set 
> of check boxes instead of radio buttons? We are a big group and could focus 
> on more than one document at a time.

There are other questions where the options aren't exclusive;
in particular, "Which documents do you think are OK for the group to
publish in their current state?"
and "Which documents do you think are good for the group to publish soon
but only after critical issues are addressed"?

We're a big group, but we don't seem to have many editors, and
we don't have many chairs. There are some centralized resources.
Plus, our audience can only hear so many things at once.

I could have made the first question a rank-ordering rather than
just "pick one", perhaps, but changing it at this point would
introduce some dirty data; perhaps more noise than signal.


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
gpg D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Monday, 22 October 2007 16:43:25 UTC