- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:46:03 -0500
- To: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, XHTML2 WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF7FBE01CB.5898528F-ON86257378.00040255-86257378.00043473@us.ibm.com>
Thanks for the correction on Anne's statement. My apologies to Mark. Hopefully, the W3C can straightent out where the link goes. :-) Rich Schwerdtfeger Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz> To 10/17/2007 06:03 Mark Birbeck PM <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com> cc Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, XHTML2 WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org> Subject Re: Meeting with SVG, XHTML, WAI people to move forward on ARIA as a cross cutting technology Mark Birbeck wrote: > Rich, > > >> Sorry, I meant xhtml 2 working goup. There is no "xhtml working group." BTW if you click the >> link to XHTML on the W3C web site it goes the the XHTML 2 working group. >> FWIW I don't think the XHTML link should go to the XHTML 2 working group page, see below. > It was Anne who was making the distinction between the "XHTML WG" and > the "XHTML 2 WG", not me; I used the term "XHTML WG" and he rather > astutely pointed out that there was no such thing. > Which was a good point to make, especially since there is actually 2 groups working on XHTML. The "XHTML2 working group" http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/ and the "HTML working group" http://www.w3.org/html/wg/ -- Dean Edridge
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic20965.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 00:46:36 UTC