- From: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:46:03 -0500
- To: Dean Edridge <dean@55.co.nz>
- Cc: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, XHTML2 WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <OF7FBE01CB.5898528F-ON86257378.00040255-86257378.00043473@us.ibm.com>
Thanks for the correction on Anne's statement. My apologies to Mark.
Hopefully, the W3C can straightent out where the link goes. :-)
Rich Schwerdtfeger
Distinguished Engineer, SWG Accessibility Architect/Strategist
Chair, IBM Accessibility Architecture Review Board
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/schwer
Dean Edridge
<dean@55.co.nz>
To
10/17/2007 06:03 Mark Birbeck
PM <mark.birbeck@formsPlayer.com>
cc
Richard
Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS,
HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>,
XHTML2 WG <public-xhtml2@w3.org>
Subject
Re: Meeting with SVG, XHTML, WAI
people to move forward on ARIA as a
cross cutting technology
Mark Birbeck wrote:
> Rich,
>
>
>> Sorry, I meant xhtml 2 working goup. There is no "xhtml working group."
BTW if you click the
>> link to XHTML on the W3C web site it goes the the XHTML 2 working group.
>>
FWIW I don't think the XHTML link should go to the XHTML 2 working group
page, see below.
> It was Anne who was making the distinction between the "XHTML WG" and
> the "XHTML 2 WG", not me; I used the term "XHTML WG" and he rather
> astutely pointed out that there was no such thing.
>
Which was a good point to make, especially since there is actually 2
groups working on XHTML.
The "XHTML2 working group" http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/
and the "HTML working group" http://www.w3.org/html/wg/
-- Dean Edridge
Attachments
- image/gif attachment: graycol.gif
- image/gif attachment: pic20965.gif
- image/gif attachment: ecblank.gif
Received on Thursday, 18 October 2007 00:46:36 UTC