Re: Precision in terminology: "inline-level content"

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:54:40 +0200, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> wrote:
> <address> should take strictly inline-level content only for backwards  
> compat reasons, right?

I think only Firefox has "issues" with block level children during parsing:

   http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2007Aug/0339.html


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>

Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 14:30:57 UTC