- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:54:40 +0300
- To: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Oct 9, 2007, at 13:42, Henri Sivonen wrote: > I have taken "inline-level content" to mean "structured inline- > level content" when it appears as a content model, but I think it > would be better for the spec to explicitly say "structured inline- > level content" in content models. Except in the case of the content model of <address>, it seems. <address> should take strictly inline-level content only for backwards compat reasons, right? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Wednesday, 10 October 2007 09:55:00 UTC