- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:05:02 -0400
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: public-html@w3.org
Hi, Dr. O- I'd like to note that in addition to poetry, the same solution could be applied to song lyrics, which are very widespread content on the Web. There are many sites devoted to nothing else, and sites like MySpace (and many blogs) have a lot of lyrical content. I personally favor the idea of loosening up the definition of <p> into just that of a block of text (since the idea of a paragraph is not universal among natural-language orthographies), and using some other semantic system to annotate specialities of written language (where you could, for example, choose between a simple poetry markup and a more complex one that notates free verse or sonnets or even structural elements of iambic pentameter). This might be RDFa, or spans marked with microformats tags. You'll be able to get much more precision than with a blunt tool like HTML. Including lyrics in the category of poetry does make explicit a couple of interesting technological/processing aspects, thought: 1) guitar tabs (or other musical notation) could be integrated using ruby; 2) timed text (as for karaoke) could be used to add meter and rhythm to the presentation style (think SMIL or HTML+Time). And, of course, as you point out, giving special consideration to particular types of content (such as poetic or lyrical) aids in its categorization or aggregation. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Staff Contact, SVG, CDF, and WebAPI
Received on Friday, 5 October 2007 20:05:17 UTC