- From: Eric Eggert <w3c@yatil.de>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:34:17 +0200
- To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
This is my first message to this mailing list so be gentle :) I’m in favor dropping @longdesc because I think there are better alternatives. First I have a few considerations, when @longdesc would make sense. 1) Images which are showcased and where you need every detail. 2) Academic graphics and graphs. There’s no use using @longdesc with other images either because there description with @alt is sufficient or because surrounding Elements give enough impression or because it's just plain decorative and should have been done with CSS but wasn’t. My solution would be dropping the @longdesc in favor for a@rel=longdesc. This would be consistent in all current, past and future browsers eliminating any accessibility problems and give screen readers something they can rely on. To make it more universal you could even name it alternative (like stylesheets) to provide alternative ways for captchas, for example. One major drawback is, that the image itself can’t be a link to e.g. another image (like in galleries), which can or cannot be acceptable considering that I think the most links on images are some kind of @longdesc at the moment. Eric Eggert http://yatil.de
Received on Monday, 25 June 2007 15:32:56 UTC