- From: Kris Krueger <krisk@microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:39:28 +0000
- To: Jakob Nilsson-Ehle <jnehle@gmail.com>, "public-html-testsuite@w3.org" <public-html-testsuite@w3.org>
Can you provide more specifics for the 'test suite' and the specific test cases? -Thx -----Original Message----- From: public-html-testsuite-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-testsuite-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jakob Nilsson-Ehle Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2010 9:43 AM To: public-html-testsuite@w3.org Subject: JPEG Quality test Hi, I recently stumbled across the test suite while trying to solve a few problems I'm having with Chrome and Firefox toDataUrl implementation with image/jpeg encoding. In most of the tests regarding canvas jpeg encoding, the test will automatically pass if the browser doesn't support. If there a reason for this? Seems to me that it makes more sense to fail the browser on the jpeg specifics if it doesn't support jpeg and instead passing it on the toDataURL.unrecognized if it successfully falls back to png. Best regards, Jakob
Received on Monday, 29 November 2010 16:40:03 UTC