W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > February 2015

Re: MSE and EME heartbeat publications

From: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:53:50 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHD2rsg1Xm+V2MHaBni8pCms_TPVNKJRWqncwK7-6cr697LPMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>, "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, "Jerry Smith (WINDOWS)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com)" <acolwell@google.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
Comments inline.

Once we figure out what we are publishing, where/how should I stage the
files?

On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
wrote:

> > Making sure I have the right context: you want to publish the registries
> in W3C datedspace (/YYYY/MM/foo-registry.html) so that everyone is happy
> with it being a sufficiently stable and controlled reference?
>
> When MSE was last published in July 2014 [3] it referred to a dated space
> version of the "Media Source Extensions Byte Stream Format Registry" [4].
>
> So doing the same now for EME (and for MSE if updates to its registry are
> required) makes sense to me.
>

We want to do this for EME eventually (later this year), but we need to
reorganize the registry first. For now, I think it's simplest if we just
include them as is next to the EME spec as we did last time. Can we do that
and address these issues for the next WD?

>
> Note that the August 2014 EME heartbeat [1] referenced a Jun 2014 version
> Editor's Draft of "Encrypted Media Extensions Stream Format and
> Initialization Data Format Registry" [2].
>

The registry files are in ED form and appear to have the date the ED was
last updated and were not updated to be WDs. (The MSE registry uses a
non-spec-track template.)

>
> /paulc
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-encrypted-media-20140828/
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/WD-encrypted-media-20140828/initdata-format-registry.html
> [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/CR-media-source-20140717/
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2013/12/byte-stream-format-registry/
>
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@w3.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 5:20 AM
> To: Paul Cotton; David Dorwin; Michael[tm] Smith; Philippe Le Hegaret (
> plh@w3.org)
> Cc: Jerry Smith (WINDOWS); Mark Watson; Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com>
> (acolwell@google.com); Adrian Bateman; public-html-media@w3.org
> Subject: Re: MSE and EME heartbeat publications
>
> On 09/02/2015 23:58 , Paul Cotton wrote:
> > I suggest the W3C Team help us here since I don’t want the publication
> > cycle to go forward only to have the WebMaster refuse to publish MSE
> > and EME on the TR page refer to registries somewhere else unless we
> > get prior notice that this is okay.
>
> Making sure I have the right context: you want to publish the registries
> in W3C datedspace (/YYYY/MM/foo-registry.html) so that everyone is happy
> with it being a sufficiently stable and controlled reference? If so just
> tell me which documents exactly to copy (and if they have resource
> dependencies — the dumber you assume I am the fewer issues there will
> be) and I'll set you up with something under /2015/02/your-file-name.html.
>
> --
> Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
>
Received on Tuesday, 10 February 2015 22:54:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 10 February 2015 22:54:41 UTC