W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > February 2015

Re: MSE and EME heartbeat publications

From: Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 01:52:50 +0100
Message-ID: <54DAA7E2.7090708@w3.org>
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
CC: "Michael[tm] Smith" <mike@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, "Jerry Smith (WINDOWS)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Aaron Colwell <acolwell@google.com> (acolwell@google.com)" <acolwell@google.com>, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
On 10/02/2015 23:53 , David Dorwin wrote:
> Once we figure out what we are publishing, where/how should I stage the
> files?

If and when you wish to publish those documents to datedspace you will 
need to ask Mike or I to do it (or any other friendly Team member) as we 
are the only ones with access. Setting it up is not a problem.

> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 7:10 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
> <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote:
> We want to do this for EME eventually (later this year), but we need to
> reorganize the registry first. For now, I think it's simplest if we just
> include them as is next to the EME spec as we did last time. Can we do
> that and address these issues for the next WD?

I have no issue with that personally. The webmaster might object 
depending on how the documents are structured but there are probably 
ways around that.

If the webmaster is unhappy, one thing you might do is to use the same 
WD style (without boilerplate) and mark the content as non normative — 
as if it were a non-normative chapter of the specification, more or less.

Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2015 00:53:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:58 UTC