W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > February 2015

RE: HTML plan review at upcoming AB

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 21:12:14 +0000
To: "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BN3PR0301MB118502E50193F31EB70FD5F3EA3B0@BN3PR0301MB1185.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> For the widest possible distribution of any questions and/or responses please respond to:
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Feb/0000.html


My bad.  The correct URL of  the original message is:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2015Feb/0003.html 

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 4:08 PM
To: public-html-media@w3.org
Subject: FW: HTML plan review at upcoming AB

Forwarding to the TF since this plan explicitly mentioned the existing HTML WG Task Forces and implementation of this plan or some variant of it might impact the TF going forward.

For the widest possible distribution of any questions and/or responses please respond to:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2015Feb/0000.html 

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 3:58 PM
To: public-html-admin@w3.org
Subject: HTML plan review at upcoming AB

 From the plan review itself:

> This is work in progress. It has only been looked at by Sam, Paul, 
> PLH, and Robin. This document has no official status and was simply 
> produced in response to a request from the AB. Some elements of this 
> plan have been rejected previously and could undergo substantial 
> changes before coming into effect.

Full plan can be found here:

   http://darobin.github.io/after5/html-plan.html


  - - -

 From the accompanying slides:

>  *  Is delegating triage of HTML bugs to the WHATWG acceptable?
>  *  Is our proposed handling of errata acceptable?
>  *  Does the AB have an opinion on our “supergroup” organisation?
>  *  Is our licensing strategy good?
>  *  Is our plan likely to lead to better browser vendor engagement?
>  *  Given a CG-based model, what is the incentive for Members to participate?

The full set of slides can be found here:

   http://darobin.github.io/after5/slides/#/


  - - -

Feedback is welcome.  Feedback in the form of pull requests is preferred:

   https://github.com/darobin/after5.git


- Sam Ruby

Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 21:12:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:58 UTC