- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 15:58:24 -0500
- To: public-html-admin@w3.org
From the plan review itself: > This is work in progress. It has only been looked at by Sam, Paul, > PLH, and Robin. This document has no official status and was simply > produced in response to a request from the AB. Some elements of this > plan have been rejected previously and could undergo substantial > changes before coming into effect. Full plan can be found here: http://darobin.github.io/after5/html-plan.html - - - From the accompanying slides: > * Is delegating triage of HTML bugs to the WHATWG acceptable? > * Is our proposed handling of errata acceptable? > * Does the AB have an opinion on our “supergroup” organisation? > * Is our licensing strategy good? > * Is our plan likely to lead to better browser vendor engagement? > * Given a CG-based model, what is the incentive for Members to participate? The full set of slides can be found here: http://darobin.github.io/after5/slides/#/ - - - Feedback is welcome. Feedback in the form of pull requests is preferred: https://github.com/darobin/after5.git - Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2015 20:58:47 UTC