W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > January 2014

RE: Do we need a step to "Add the new object to an internal list of session objects"?

From: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:24:39 +0000
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
Message-ID: <cc48506d9d174bdb8a1e46d2abadfc9c@BL2PR03MB604.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
That sounds fine – I included it in loadSession just copied from createSession.

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2014 6:21 PM
To: Adrian Bateman; public-html-media@w3.org
Subject: Do we need a step to "Add the new object to an internal list of session objects"?

Step 3 of both createSession()<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/default/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#dom-createsession> and loadSession()<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/default/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#dom-loadsession> is to "Add the new object to an internal list of session objects." It's unclear what the purpose of this step is, and I don't believe there is a step to remove a session from the internal list. I believe we can just remove this step.

The CDM implementation almost certainly keeps an internal list of sessions, but that would occur in the task (step 4) and probably doesn't need to be specified.

Does anyone object to removing these steps?

David
Received on Saturday, 11 January 2014 15:25:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:44 UTC