W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-media@w3.org > January 2014

Re: Do we need a step to "Add the new object to an internal list of session objects"?

From: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 17:04:39 -0800
Message-ID: <CAHD2rsiqh6cWXDwB4t0GAHCki2yPHL803TFfasRvvU3F=evJKA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-html-media@w3.org" <public-html-media@w3.org>
Removed: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/rev/1a2d27b2171b


On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>wrote:

>  That sounds fine – I included it in loadSession just copied from
> createSession.
>
>
>
> *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, January 10, 2014 6:21 PM
> *To:* Adrian Bateman; public-html-media@w3.org
> *Subject:* Do we need a step to "Add the new object to an internal list
> of session objects"?
>
>
>
> Step 3 of both createSession()<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/default/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#dom-createsession>and
> loadSession()<https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html-media/raw-file/default/encrypted-media/encrypted-media.html#dom-loadsession>is to "Add the new object to an internal list of session objects." It's
> unclear what the purpose of this step is, and I don't believe there is a
> step to remove a session from the internal list. I believe we can just
> remove this step.
>
>
>
> The CDM implementation almost certainly keeps an internal list of
> sessions, but that would occur in the task (step 4) and probably doesn't
> need to be specified.
>
>
>
> Does anyone object to removing these steps?
>
>
>
> David
>
Received on Saturday, 25 January 2014 01:05:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 15:48:44 UTC