- From: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 03:14:34 -0400
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- CC: Gregg Kellogg <gregg@kellogg-assoc.com>, Gavin Carothers <gavin@topquadrant.com>, "public-html-data-tf@w3.org" <public-html-data-tf@w3.org>
I'm just adding it to the spec, as I don't believe it's controversial. Gregg On Oct 18, 2011, at 3:21 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: > So someone should file an issue on this. It should be possible to specify the language of an invisible element. > If not for the Microdata spec, then at least for the Microdata-to-RDF extraction, where language tags are a first-class citizen. > Martin > > On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:34 PM, Gregg Kellogg wrote: > >> Language tagged literals are supported, but for some reason not on meta. See "property values" in my spec. >> >> Gregg Kellogg >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 18, 2011, at 2:24 PM, "Martin Hepp" <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gavin, >>> thanks for raising this. But as far as I can see, this issue is "still pending review" and anyway just considered for RDF 1.1, so current SPARQL implementations will still break on this. >>> >>> Anyway, in this respect I think it is important to find a way to indicate the language of the value for a "content" attribute in >>> >>> <meta content="xyz"> >>> >>> patterns in Microdata; I just found out that the language of the context will not be used by Microdata-to-RDF parsers. >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> On Oct 18, 2011, at 11:09 PM, Gavin Carothers wrote: >>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Martin Hepp >>>> <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote: >>>>> Ah! Thanks! That is a bug in my RDFa example. In all GoodRelations examples, we use datatyping, except for xsd:string, because while this is theoretically needed, too, the distinction between plain literals and typed RDF literals with xsd:string as their type is hard to explain to practitioners. >>>> >>>> The RDF WG has resolved to remove that distinction. "example" == >>>> "example"^^xsd:string the current working draft of RDF Concepts talks >>>> more about this, >>>> http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-concepts/#section-Graph-Literal >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Gavin >>> >
Received on Wednesday, 19 October 2011 07:15:38 UTC