[Bug 24647] Define table@border as explicit indication that the *borders* are meaningful

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24647

--- Comment #23 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #20)
> (In reply to steve faulkner from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #15)
> > 
> > > You need to go over the data. It contains lots of false hits (e.g. border on
> > > <img>, data-border="1", frameborder="1" and so on). And you need to analyse
> > > the findings.
> > 
> > I provided the data as is, you can do with it what you will.
> 
> Sure. But it was your claim that the data shows that table@border is not
> particulary linked to tables. Let me put it differently: You have not
> provided that that demonstrates that it is like that. To do so, you need to
> collect better data and/or analyse your data better.

you opened a bug "Define table@border as explicit indication that the *borders*
are meaningful"

I have asked you to provide data to support this. The data I looked at didn't
support this, the onus is on you to provide data to support your request.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 14:58:18 UTC