- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:55:07 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24679
--- Comment #2 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> ---
(In reply to Leif Halvard Silli from comment #0)
> Data regarding tabl@border: In bug 24647, 7th comment, Steve provided some
> data which he claims questions that the best heuristic effect of
> table@border=1 is that it is a non-layout tabel
> <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24647#c7>.
...
> analysis might show that Steve’s data could allow us to improve on what the
> spec states about table@border and layout vs non-layout tables.
CSS borders: If table@border is put under scrutiny with regard to its effect on
layout table heuristics, it would also make sense to put under scrutiny the
spec’s claim about borders via CSS: ”Explicit visible borders set using CSS |
Probably a non-layout table”
Zebra striping via CSS nth-child pseudo selectors, e.g.
tr:nth-child(odd){background:lime}, should count as indication htat the table
is a non-layout table.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 14:55:12 UTC