[Bug 24647] Define table@border as explicit indication that the *borders* are meaningful

https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=24647

--- Comment #24 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> ---
(In reply to steve faulkner from comment #23)


> you opened a bug "Define table@border as explicit indication that the
> *borders* are meaningful"
> 
> I have asked you to provide data to support this. The data I looked at
> didn't support this, the onus is on you to provide data to support your
> request.

Steve, do you say that my critisism of your data is uniteresting to you? Then
why tell me should I interest me for your data?

At any raate: I *have* already provided more analysis of your data than you
have provided. Please inform me whether my analysis is wrong.

Btw, tt is fine that you emphasise *border*. However you said that your data
analysis related not to border but to ”data table”.

]]
can you provide data that there is a strong correlation between the presence of
<table border=1> and the table being used as a data table?

I looked at the latest http://webdevdata.org data set and could find no such
correlation, in fact I found the opposite.
]]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Saturday, 15 February 2014 16:15:17 UTC