- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:55:59 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |TrackerRequest --- Comment #6 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> --- Tracker Title: Change publication track of Microdata to W3C Note Tracker Text: Ratifying two completely different specifications, RDFa and Microdata, that accomplish the same thing in basically the same way is a failure of the standardization process. The functionality of RDFa, which is already a W3C Recommendation, overlaps Microdata by a large margin. RDFa Lite 1.1 was developed as a plug-in replacement for Microdata. Since Microdata can be interpreted as RDFa based on a simple search-and-replace of attributes that the languages have effectively converged on syntax except for the attribute names. The full version of RDFa can also do a number of things that Microdata cannot, such as datatyping, associating more than one type per object, embed-ability in languages other than HTML, ability to easily publish and mix vocabularies, etc. The HTML WG should not publish a specification on the REC track that already does the same thing in almost exactly the same way as another specification published by the W3C on the REC track. Change the publication track of Microdata to a W3C Note. This allows further development of the spec, use of the spec in the marketplace, and the opportunity to make it a REC in the future if the need arises. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 20:56:00 UTC