- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 01:35:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082 Bug ID: 20082 Summary: Change Microdata specification track to W3C Note Classification: Unclassified Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P2 Component: CR HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson) Assignee: ian@hixie.ch Reporter: msporny@digitalbazaar.com QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org There is more confusion today about picking Microdata or RDFa because they accomplish the same thing in effectively the same way. It is typically a bad idea to have two formats published by the same organization that do the same thing. It leads to Web developer confusion surrounding which format to use. One of the goals of Web standards is to reduce, or preferably eliminate, the confusion surrounding the correct technology decision to make. If we step back and look at the technical arguments, there is no compelling reason that Microdata should be a W3C Recommendation. There is no compelling reason to have two specifications that do the same thing in almost exactly the same way. Therefore, as a member of the HTML Working Group (not as a chair or editor of RDFa) I object to the publication of Microdata as a Candidate Recommendation. The details and argumentation that led to this objection can be found in the HTML WG mailing list archive: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0177.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 01:35:03 UTC