- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2012 01:35:01 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082
Bug ID: 20082
Summary: Change Microdata specification track to W3C Note
Classification: Unclassified
Product: HTML WG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: P2
Component: CR HTML Microdata (editor: Ian Hickson)
Assignee: ian@hixie.ch
Reporter: msporny@digitalbazaar.com
QA Contact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
There is more confusion today about picking Microdata or RDFa because they
accomplish the same thing in effectively the same way.
It is typically a bad idea to have two formats published by the same
organization that do the same thing. It leads to Web developer confusion
surrounding which format to use. One of the goals of Web standards is to
reduce, or preferably eliminate, the confusion surrounding the correct
technology decision to make.
If we step back and look at the technical arguments, there is no compelling
reason that Microdata should be a W3C Recommendation. There is no compelling
reason to have two specifications that do the same thing in almost exactly the
same way. Therefore, as a member of the HTML Working Group (not as a chair or
editor of RDFa) I object to the publication of Microdata as a Candidate
Recommendation.
The details and argumentation that led to this objection can be found in the
HTML WG mailing list archive:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2012Nov/0177.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 01:35:03 UTC