- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 20:45:33 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082 Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX |--- --- Comment #5 from Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> --- The question before the HTML WG at the time was whether or not to split Microdata out of the HTML5 specification, not the publishing track for the Microdata document. At the time the decision was made, RDFa Lite 1.1 did not exist, RDFa Lite 1.1 was not a W3C Recommendation, nor did the RDFa and Microdata functionality so greatly overlap as they do now. The decision states the following under the "Revisiting the issue" section: "If Microdata and RDFa converge in syntax..." Since Microdata can be interpreted as RDFa based on a simple search-and-replace of attributes that the languages have effectively converged on syntax except for the attribute names. The proposal is not to have work on Microdata stopped. I am not suggesting we switch to the "Mad Max" option. Let work on Microdata proceed in this group, but let it proceed on the W3C Note publication track. I request that this issue is escalated to an HTML WG issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 27 November 2012 20:45:40 UTC