- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:28:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12563 brunoais <brunoaiss@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NEEDSINFO | --- Comment #5 from brunoais <brunoaiss@gmail.com> 2011-06-17 07:28:14 UTC --- Let's see if I can make these straight this time: mpeg4 (codec family) (many browsers have it, others don't and I can't see it specified) -> The high quality substitute for flv. Smartphones support it, PDA's support it, all players (from many I know) for WinNT, MAC & Linux support it, why wouldn't browsers support it? H.264 -> A lot used specially with mkv and flv, these days. This would allow to have many different videos with different extensions play in the browser. Xvid -> Lots of OS have native support for it (according to my research) and it's a fair "brother" of mpeg4. Also, those codecs are free to use (according to wikipedia) For audio codecs: FLAC -> The standard these days to distribute in a lossless quality and a fair memory use (for a lossless audio). mpeg3 (codec family) -> The standard audio these days. A good balance between quality and memory used. I shure hope this makes it more clear -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 07:28:16 UTC