- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:28:15 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12563
brunoais <brunoaiss@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NEEDSINFO |
--- Comment #5 from brunoais <brunoaiss@gmail.com> 2011-06-17 07:28:14 UTC ---
Let's see if I can make these straight this time:
mpeg4 (codec family) (many browsers have it, others don't and I can't see it
specified) -> The high quality substitute for flv. Smartphones support it,
PDA's support it, all players (from many I know) for WinNT, MAC & Linux support
it, why wouldn't browsers support it?
H.264 -> A lot used specially with mkv and flv, these days. This would allow to
have many different videos with different extensions play in the browser.
Xvid -> Lots of OS have native support for it (according to my research) and
it's a fair "brother" of mpeg4. Also, those codecs are free to use (according
to wikipedia)
For audio codecs:
FLAC -> The standard these days to distribute in a lossless quality and a fair
memory use (for a lossless audio).
mpeg3 (codec family) -> The standard audio these days. A good balance between
quality and memory used.
I shure hope this makes it more clear
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 17 June 2011 07:28:16 UTC