- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 16:29:35 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7697 KevBurnsJr <kevburnsjr@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevburnsjr@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from KevBurnsJr <kevburnsjr@gmail.com> 2009-09-23 16:29:34 --- How the client uses the a[type] attribute is up to them, as the type attribute is "purely advisory". Using the type attribute in the way you've outlined is permitted by the existing specification. Your example does not suggest any additional constraints, only suggesting best practice. While it may be good practice for a client to use the a[type] in the request header, I can see how that implementation detail probably does not belong in the HTML language specification. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 16:29:43 UTC