- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:11:38 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7843 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2009-10-20 09:11:38 --- If we make them async, the state of the element will be at odds with the event. For example, 'emptied' would fire at a time that doesn't involve the element being empty. That seems bad, from an API perspective, no? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 09:11:40 UTC