- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:14:53 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7843 Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simonp@opera.com --- Comment #3 from Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> 2009-10-20 11:14:53 --- I'd like to reopen this bug, but can't see an option to do that (probably need an admin account). All other events on media elements are async with the actual state and cannot be trusted. In the case of 'abort' and 'emptied' ('loadend' is no more) the state of the media element is reset before firing them, so there is nothing there which scripts could reasonably depend on. The main reason I'd like these events to be async is because it would be much easier to implement with all events being treated equally. In an interruptable ECMAScript engine synchronous (from the scripts point of view) event handling requires saving all state and waiting for the handler to finish before continuing. It can be done, but it's annoying and it would be nice if there were a compelling reason to do it. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 11:14:57 UTC