- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:15:58 +0000
- To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6763 Summary: Inconsistent use of American and British English Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/ OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Spec bugs AssignedTo: dave.null@w3.org ReportedBy: jens@meiert.com QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: ian@hixie.ch, mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org (Apologies for not searching W3C Bugzilla for duplicates.) The spec draft currently uses both American and British English. While I’m not a 100 % sure if W3C documents aren’t and shouldn’t be usually written in American English anyway, making this consistent would definitely be helpful. In case we’d like to default to American English, here’s a list of words in the spec that seem to be of British origin: * behaviour * categorise/categorised * colour/coloured * emphasised * favour * favourite * flavours * honour * optimise * recognise/recognised * serialise/serialisation * tokeniser -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 08:16:06 UTC