Re: Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a first public working draft (FPWD) of ARIA in HTML

I’d like to see the typical Conformance section added defining the RFC2119 keywords used in the spec. Other than that, it’s a +1 on FPWD.

I second the need to more clearly contextualise this document wrt HTML5.1 as well as the Using ARIA in HTML document.

Has there been any consideration to combining ARIA in HTML and Using ARIA in HTML?

To cut down on repetition of content across documents, should the latter two docs remain separate, I think section 2.14 in Using ARIA in HTML should just point to the same content that is in the ARIA in HTML spec. Or at least the two docs should be coordinated to avoid repeating the same information.

Jason


Jason Kiss
jason@accessibleculture.org
http://www.accessibleculture.org




> On 3/03/2015, at 12:33 pm, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> udpated with correct subject line 
> 
> This is Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish a first public working draft (FPWD) of ARIA in HTML:
> 
> http://rawgit.com/webspecs/html-aria/master/index.src.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=2015-03-11;wg=HTML%20Working%20Group;wgURI=http://www.w3.org/html/wg/;wgPublicList=public-html <http://rawgit.com/webspecs/html-aria/master/index.src.html?specStatus=FPWD;publishDate=2015-03-11;wg=HTML%20Working%20Group;wgURI=http://www.w3.org/html/wg/;wgPublicList=public-html>
> 
> This CfC is in response to a request from the Editor[1] of the specification.
> 
> If anyone needs an extension feel free to request one, and specify both a reason for the request and how long you feel you need.
> 
> Silence will be taken to mean there is no objection, but positive responses are encouraged. If there are no objections by Tuesday March 10th, this resolution will carry.
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2015Mar/0002.html <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2015Mar/0002.html>
> 
>