On 4 March 2015 at 09:51, jason@accessibleculture.org < jason@accessibleculture.org> wrote: > I’d like to see the typical Conformance section added defining the RFC2119 > keywords used in the spec. Other than that, it’s a +1 on FPWD. > agree > > I second the need to more clearly contextualise this document wrt HTML5.1 > as well as the Using ARIA in HTML document. > sure > > Has there been any consideration to combining ARIA in HTML and Using ARIA > in HTML? > > not yet, but will consider. > To cut down on repetition of content across documents, should the latter > two docs remain separate, I think section 2.14 in Using ARIA in HTML should > just point to the same content that is in the ARIA in HTML spec. Or at > least the two docs should be coordinated to avoid repeating the same > information. > yeah can do. -- Regards SteveF HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
Received on Thursday, 5 March 2015 02:01:33 UTC