Re: Call for Consensus: HTML after 5 plan comments

Hi,

given a total absence of support, I do not think the TF can formally make any comments.

That said I note that the major concerns had in fact already been addressed, and we could hope that they won't get lost in the further planning process.

cheers

Chaals

27.02.2015, 20:36, "chaals@yandex-team.ru" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>:
> Hi,
>
> this is a call for consensus on a formal TF response to the HTML plan <http://darobin.github.io/after5/html-plan.html>. Note that individuals are also free to make personal comments, and I believe the editor gratefully accepts Pull Requests through github…
>
> Please reply before end of day Sunday 8 February, stating whether you agree or not that the TF should formally make each of the following comments:
>
> 1. Please ensure that HTML WG Task Forces, as well as CGs, can produce "input specs"
>
> 2. Please maintain the sense of the text that points out groups need to ensure proper accessibility (and other) review of their work if they are bringing it to HTML in the hope of "fast track" adoption:
>
>   "CGs that produce Final Specifications can bring them to the HTML WG
>    as a way to get them to Recommendation relatively efficiently, provided
>    they have undergone credible levels of review, notably horizontal review
>    (I18N, A11Y, etc.) which naturally includes a reasonable amount of testing"
>
> 3. Please maintain the possibility for filing bugs directly with the HTML Working Group - especially for things which are not in the what-wg's specifications.
>
> cheers
>
> Chaals
>
> --
> Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
> chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

--
Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex
chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com

Received on Friday, 13 March 2015 21:52:33 UTC