- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 19:40:26 +0000
- To: 'Janina Sajka' <janina@rednote.net>, "Charles McCathie Nevile (chaals@yandex-team.ru)" <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- CC: 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
> The TF has not resolved the disagreement of the Co-Facilitators whether the ARIA related deliverables are, or are not, TF work items. If the Co-Facilitators cannot decide I suggest you ask the Chairs of HTML WG and PF WG to make the decision for the TF. /paulc Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 -----Original Message----- From: 'Janina Sajka' [mailto:janina@rednote.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 8:54 AM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Charles McCathie Nevile (chaals@yandex-team.ru); 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' Subject: Re: Updating our work statement Paul Cotton writes: > What is the status of updating the A11Y "work statement"? > The TF has not resolved the disagreement of the Co-Facilitators whether the ARIA related deliverables are, or are not, TF work items. The list of deliverables is to be pulled from the WS and separately published so that we can update the deliverables list without reauthorizing the WS. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2015Feb/0053.html The WS is otherwise unchanged. I will be proposing an amendment to the Consensus Policy to allow for concurrent CfCs, rather than sequential CfCs, as heretofore. Expect that email this week to TF, PF, and HTML-Admin. Janina > /paulc > > PS: This thread started at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2015Jan/0050.html > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Léonie Watson [mailto:lwatson@paciellogroup.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 3:07 AM > To: 'Liam R E Quin'; 'Shane McCarron' > Cc: 'Janina Sajka'; 'HTML Accessibility Task Force' > Subject: RE: Updating our work statement > > > From: Liam R E Quin [mailto:liam@w3.org] > > Sent: 03 February 2015 04:24 > > Is the wiki OK for *reading* from an accessibility point of view? > > > > Wiki content tends to be basic, so providing all the usual good things happen (headings, link text, clear language etc.) it should be usable for most people. More specifically it's no bother (editing or consuming) with a screen reader. > > Léonie. > > > -- > Senior Accessibility Engineer, TPG > @LeonieWatson @PacielloGroup > > > -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net Email: janina@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Protocols & Formats http://www.w3.org/wai/pf Indie UI http://www.w3.org/WAI/IndieUI/
Received on Tuesday, 3 March 2015 19:40:56 UTC