- From: Ranon, Marco <Marco.Ranon@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 17:05:52 -0000
- To: <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi, Minutes from the 3 March 2011 meeting of the HTML Accessibility Task Force: http://www.w3.org/2011/03/03-html-a11y-minutes.html Plain text follows below. Regards, Marco [1]W3C [1] http://www.w3.org/ - DRAFT - HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference 03 Mar 2011 [2]Agenda [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Mar/0026.html See also: [3]IRC log [3] http://www.w3.org/2011/03/03-html-a11y-irc Attendees Present Eric, John_Foliot, Michael_Cooper, paulc, Gregory_Rosmaita, Mike_Smith, Marco_Ranon, Cynthia_Shelly, Rich, Martin_Kliehm, MikeSmith Regrets Laura_Carlson, Kenny_Johar, Silvia_Pfieffer, Janina_Sajka Chair MikeSmith Scribe Marco_Ranon Contents * [4]Topics 1. [5]Face2Face Planning/Schedule 2. [6]ARIA in HTML Decision & Follow-Up 3. [7]issue 30 (longdesc) 4. [8]bug 11893 (lexical processing rules for ARIA) question from Hixie 5. [9]canvas subteam 6. [10]media subteam report 7. [11]bug triage 8. [12]aria mapping subteam report 9. [13]f2f planning 10. [14]ARIA Next and HTML5 11. [15]Other Issues WHich Need Immediate Attention 12. [16]open action items * [17]Summary of Action Items _________________________________________________________ <trackbot> Date: 03 March 2011 <MikeSmith> hmm <paulc> paulc on manual mute <oedipus> scribe: Marco_Ranon <oedipus> scribenick: Marco_Ranon <oedipus> [18]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/201103_ftf/ [18] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/201103_ftf/ <oedipus> [19]http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/201103_ftf/results [19] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/201103_ftf/results <MichaelC> agenda: [20]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Mar/002 6.html [20] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Mar/0026.html Face2Face Planning/Schedule MS: survey for f2f meeting survey ... enough people for the f2f CS: 11 March deadline for registration. Room booked. GJR: need access for remote users MS: we can use skype <oedipus> skype is fine MS: do we have two rooms for breakout group? CS: one big room MS: logistics lined up. ARIA in HTML Decision & Follow-Up RS: summary: ARIA will be included in HTML5 ... minor issues but acceptable <oedipus> [21]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0027.htm l [21] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0027.html <MikeSmith> [22]response from Steve Faulkner to Hixie's request for specific list of changes requested [22] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Mar/0067.html RS: authors might not use html5 control so for accessibility is important that aria is used <MikeSmith> [23]detailed list of changes from Steve Faulkner [23] http://www.html5accessibility.com/tests/aria-changes.html MS: positive resolution for tis issue, no strong objections issue 30 (longdesc) PC: the proposal put together by mostly Laura Carlson have been considred by the chairs and the issue reopen for LC ... we'll open a call for counter proposals <JF> +q PC: any questions? JF: when is the issue going to be considred? when is the next step? PC: it's a LC issue ... no dates that apply to pre-LC apply tho this issue ... this also applies to all other LC issues: the chairs are not asking the WG to do work on this until it's time for LC ... approx May ... but it might be appropriate for a11y people to talk discuss the issue with other people to try to reach consensus (option to be perhaps discussed off-line) <JF> +q <oedipus> it's called reality GJR: we've done that already but we want to make clear the need for the mechanism PC: we should discuss this option off-line <oedipus> we have reached the same dead end by travelling many routes MS: facilitators will talk about it <oedipus> those who objected didn't on factual/need grounds, but on faulty statistics JF: i think we need to have this conversations <oedipus> i've been discussing longdesc with IDPF/EPUB and they NEED longdesc and native describedby by March for their deadline bug 11893 (lexical processing rules for ARIA) question from Hixie [24]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Feb/022 4.html [24] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Feb/0224.html <MikeSmith> "What's the spec I should use as the reference for these rules?" <oedipus> the reference is in Steve's proposed text MS: Hixie needs more info <kliehm> [25]http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11893 [25] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11893 RS: we are working on this. More info after the f2f MS: will respond to Hixie today canvas subteam <oedipus> [26]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas [26] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas <oedipus> [27]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas/Meetings [27] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas/Meetings <oedipus> [28]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas/Meetings/Minutes [28] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Canvas/Meetings/Minutes RS: worked on a counter proposal for issue-131. PC: march 22 the deadline <oedipus> [29]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 [29] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 <oedipus> [30]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CaretSelection [30] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CaretSelection <paulc> ISSUE-131 Call for Counter Proposals closes Mar 22: [31]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0374.htm l [31] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0374.html <MikeSmith> [32]http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-131 [32] http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-131 <oedipus> call for alternate proposals for Canvas caret: [33]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0374.htm l [33] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0374.html RS: working on issue 131 MS: March 22 is the deadline for all information needed for decisions prior LC <oedipus> RS: thanks to chairs for expediting the canvas decision <oedipus> PC: thanks to those who worked on Canvas media subteam report JF: discussion on track. started with 8 solution, now need to discuss the progress at the f2f to meet the deadline <oedipus> [34]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9 [34] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9 JF: discussed issue-9 yesterday. chairs proposed to close the issue <oedipus> call for consensus/counter proposal for HTML WG Issue-9 [35]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0410.htm l [35] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0410.html JF: there is concern that closing issue-9 might affect work in progress <oedipus> [36]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Media_Accessibility_Requireme nts [36] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Media_Accessibility_Requirements JF: if issue-9 is closed we can still continue <oedipus> if hixie could at least be in IRC for pinging purposes that would be a benefit MS: Hixie might no be at the f2f, but we can ask him to join <oedipus> HTML WG Issue-9 "video-accessibility" associated with HTML WG bugs 5758, 8187, 8657, 8658, 8659, 8736 JF: issue-9 was an old issue and we have other issues that relate to current work by the subteam ... just a couple of outstanding bug GJR: bug triage subteam sould check the bugs associated to issue-9 <oedipus> HTML WG Issue-9 associated with HTML WG bugs 5758, 8187, 8657, 8658, 8659, 8736 bug triage MC: we didn't meet. nothing to report <oedipus> ACTION: kliehm - have bug triage subgroup review the bugs associated with HTML WG ISSUE-9 (bugs 5758, 8187, 8657, 8658, 8659, 8736) [recorded in [37]http://www.w3.org/2011/03/03-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01] <trackbot> Created ACTION-108 - - have bug triage subgroup review the bugs associated with HTML WG ISSUE-9 (bugs 5758, 8187, 8657, 8658, 8659, 8736) [on Martin Kliehm - due 2011-03-10]. aria mapping subteam report <kliehm> we are at inbox 0 at the moment for the bug-triage sub-team. <MikeSmith> kliehm, cool, thanks RS: nothing to add to what said before about issue-129 f2f planning <MikeSmith> [38]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Mar/002 6.html [38] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Mar/0026.html MS: proposed topics for f2f in the agenda of this meeting ... we have critical mass ... RS, do we have people for canvas discussion? RS: not sure if FrankO will be there MS: we might not have enough to do with canvas ... we should have canvas and media breakouts at the same time <oedipus> caret in canvas: [39]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 [39] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131 MS: Counter proposal to a11y TF proposal for Issue 131. (if it comes up by March 22) <oedipus> RichS change proposal for HTML WG Issue-131 [40]http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CaretSelection [40] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CaretSelection ARIA Next and HTML5 RS: Aria.next: are there things we need for html5? <oedipus> call for counter proposals on caret in canvas (deadline 22 March 2011) [41]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0374.htm l [41] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Feb/0374.html RS: for example, do we want the equivalent of a longdesc in ARIA? <JF> +q Other Issues WHich Need Immediate Attention JF: there are still some accessibilty related open issues. we are supposed to hace change proposals by March 22 ... should we discuss those issues? <oedipus> i/JF: there are still some accessiblity/TOPIC: Other Issues Which Need Immediate Attention/ MS: we are expecting chairs to make decisions on issue 31 and 32 JF: at the f2f we should have a bigger group to discuss open issues and not only breakout groups MS: agreed open action items <MikeSmith> [42]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open [42] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open <oedipus> action-106? <trackbot> ACTION-106 -- Gregory Rosmaita to - prepare keyboard access high-level issues discussion for F2F -- due 2011-03-03 -- OPEN <trackbot> [43]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/106 [43] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/106 <oedipus> action-105? <trackbot> ACTION-105 -- Gregory Rosmaita to - review w3c bugzilla installation versus newest version 4, coordinate with those who volunteered, present options and needs -- due 2011-03-03 -- OPEN <trackbot> [44]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/105 [44] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/105 MS: action-106 on GJR GJR: will do that MS: action-105 GJR: looking into this <MikeSmith> action-104: Rich says this one was done <trackbot> ACTION-104 Post question to HTML working group on whether to limit HTML elements in non-visible content such as the Canvas fallback content notes added <MikeSmith> close action-104 <trackbot> ACTION-104 Post question to HTML working group on whether to limit HTML elements in non-visible content such as the Canvas fallback content closed <oedipus> GJR needs to reset due date for action-105 (review current installation now/round-robin improvement suggestions after F2F <oedipus> [45]http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions [45] http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions <oedipus> GJR set some to "pending review" MS: to all, please close actions assigned to you that you are not taking up now, but comment on the reasons zackim, unmute me rssagent, make minutes Summary of Action Items [NEW] ACTION: kliehm - have bug triage subgroup review the bugs associated with HTML WG ISSUE-9 (bugs 5758, 8187, 8657, 8658, 8659, 8736) [recorded in [46]http://www.w3.org/2011/03/03-html-a11y-minutes.html#action01] [End of minutes] _________________________________________________________ Minutes formatted by David Booth's [47]scribe.perl version 1.135 ([48]CVS log) $Date: 2011/03/03 16:57:02 $ _________________________________________________________ [47] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm [48] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/ Scribe.perl diagnostic output [Delete this section before finalizing the minutes.] This is scribe.perl Revision: 1.135 of Date: 2009/03/02 03:52:20 Check for newer version at [49]http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002 /scribe/ [49] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/ Guessing input format: RRSAgent_Text_Format (score 1.00) Succeeded: i/MS: survey for f2f/TOPIC: Face2Face Planning/Schedule Succeeded: i/RS: summary: ARIA will/TOPIC: ARIA in HTML Decision & Foll ow-Up Succeeded: s/MS: working on issue 131/RS: working on issue 131/ Succeeded: s/RS: worked on a counter proposal for issue-133./RS: worked on a counter proposal for issue-131./ Succeeded: i/RS: Aria.next/TOPIC: ARIA Next and HTML5 FAILED: i/JF: there are still some accessiblity/TOPIC: Other Issues Whi ch Need Immediate Attention Succeeded: i/JF: there are still some accessibilty related open issues/ TOPIC: Other Issues WHich Need Immediate Attention Found Scribe: Marco_Ranon Found ScribeNick: Marco_Ranon Default Present: Eric, John_Foliot, Michael_Cooper, paulc, Gregory_Rosm aita, Mike_Smith, Marco_Ranon, Cynthia_Shelly, Rich, Martin_Kliehm, Mik eSmith Present: Eric John_Foliot Michael_Cooper paulc Gregory_Rosmaita Mike_Sm ith Marco_Ranon Cynthia_Shelly Rich Martin_Kliehm MikeSmith Regrets: Laura_Carlson Kenny_Johar Silvia_Pfieffer Janina_Sajka Agenda: [50]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Ma r/0026.html Found Date: 03 Mar 2011 Guessing minutes URL: [51]http://www.w3.org/2011/03/03-html-a11y-minute s.html People with action items: kliehm [50] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2011Mar/0026.html [51] http://www.w3.org/2011/03/03-html-a11y-minutes.html End of [52]scribe.perl diagnostic output] [52] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/scribe/scribedoc.htm -- DISCLAIMER: NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system. RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments. Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RNIB. RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227 Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk This message has been scanned for viruses by Websense Hosted Security - http://www.websense.com/content/HostedEmailSecurity.aspx
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 17:06:42 UTC