- From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:29:52 +0200
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Aurelien Levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Sam Ruby, Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:10:45 -0400: > > In the long term, a better use of those energies would be directed > towards producing more complete proposals. Note that the following > proposal makes no mention of standards, guidelines, etc: > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/longdesc +1 for more complete proposals. But whey did you not ask for clarification of 'successfully', if that was such a stumbling stone? And it would also help us use energies effectively if the decisions are more consistent and worked through than longdesc decision IMHO is. -- leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 00:30:29 UTC