W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > August 2010

Re: Notice of impending Formal Objection to Issue 30 Decision (@longdesc)

From: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:29:52 +0200
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, Aurelien Levy <aurelien.levy@free.fr>, John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, Michael(tm) Smith <mike@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20100813022952286231.ab8680af@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Sam Ruby, Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:10:45 -0400:
> In the long term, a better use of those energies would be directed 
> towards producing more complete proposals.  Note that the following 
> proposal makes no mention of standards, guidelines, etc:
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/longdesc

+1 for more complete proposals. But whey did you not ask for 
clarification of 'successfully', if that was such a stumbling stone? 
And it would also help us use energies effectively if the decisions are 
more consistent and worked through than longdesc decision  IMHO is.
leif halvard silli
Received on Friday, 13 August 2010 00:30:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:42 UTC